• Contact
  • Get Involved
  • Advertise
  • Archives
  • Classifieds
  • Business
  • Travel
  • User Agreement
  • Privacy Policy

New University

New University
  • News
  • Entertainment
  • Features
  • Sports
  • Opinion
  • Feature Photos
  • Digital Newspaper

Keeping Homosexuals From the Priesthood Not the Answer

Yolanda Vo | Oct 03, 2005 | Comments 6

  • Tweet
  • Email
  • Tweet
  • Email

According to various news sources, the Vatican is preparing a document that would bar homosexual men from entering seminaries as a response to sexual-abuse incidents. However, the word ‘homosexual’ is not clearly defined. The document has been outlined since 2001, but there is no evidence of the document, nor is it fully known if this document will be proclamated by the Vatican; still, it has many individuals stirred up.
The sexual-abuse scandals in the United States have had many individuals and the Roman Catholic Church infuriated, saddened and embarrassed. Many conservative Catholics blame homosexual priests for the scandal and feel that the church should ‘stay on the safe side’ by restricting homosexual candidates for priesthood.
To start off, I am a Catholic. Knowing that fact, you may have already formed preconceptions of me. However, I hope you will delve into what I have to say, as unsophisticated as my opinions may be.
The background to the scandal is that there have been accusations of priests sexually abusing adolescents. These accusations came from the parents or guardians of the victims, and were then presented to the bishops within their diocese. Rather than removing the accused priests from their priesthood, the bishops relocated them to different parishes and notified no one of the accusations. As a result, more young children were placed at risk.
In my opinion, the issue that should be addressed is not that of homosexual men being barred from priesthood, but rather why these bishops relocated priests when they were aware of the accusations. Bishops are looked upon highly by Catholics and Catholic priests; for bishops to disregard a sexual abuse accusation is unheard of.
What is more saddening is that there are cases where the same bishop was notified about the same priest sexually abusing another adolescent; the bishop simply relocated the priest a second time. The issue, thus, should be to reevaluate the bishops who were aware of the accusations and did little about them.
The reasoning as to why homosexual priests are targeted is based on a study commissioned by U.S. bishops that found the majority of sexual abuse victims since 1950 were adolescent boys. In addition, many individuals feel that homosexual priests are not adept for the celibate life of priesthood.
To be truthful, I cannot fully understand this argument. If we are referring to physical appearance, I would feel that a homosexual priest should not wear makeup or female attire as it may offend many individuals. However, if we are speaking strictly about sexuality, how is a heterosexual male more suited for priesthood than a homosexual male? Isn’t a heterosexual male just as attracted to a female as a homosexual male is to a male? The livelihood of a priest is to dedicate his life to God, to live a celibate life finding purpose only in God. Therefore, if a homosexual male is willing and capable of leading a celibate life, why deny him his devotion and love for God?
Moreover, what does it mean to be homosexual or heterosexual? While many individuals can definitively state their sexual orientation, the spectrum as to what an individual is may be blurred. Because this spectrum of sexuality is blurred, who are we to deny the celibate life to these potential priests? If a homosexual priest is leading a virtuous, chaste life and not living or promoting a ‘gay lifestyle,’ I think all should be fine and even God may smile upon him.

Popularity: unranked [?]

Post to Twitter Tweet This Post

Filed Under: Opinion

Tags: News • Opinion

RSSComments (6)

Leave a Reply | Trackback URL

  1. Ben says:
    September 26, 2009 at 4:37 pm

    True story. There once was a priest who was secretary to the bishop. Said secretary
    made an agressive sexual move on a subordinate priest. The subordinate priest filed
    a civil suit. The diocese paid. One of these to priests was made pastor of a parish
    that ministers to a school. You know the one. This is just sooooo wrong.

    Sorry but this simply must stop.

    Reply
  2. Georgina says:
    September 26, 2009 at 4:30 pm

    I totally agree. Homosexuals pose no threat as long, as with Hetrosexuals, their spirits & hearts are dedicated to the service of Almight GOD. People who are Gay are not animals who rut at the drop of a hat. The people who must be kept out of all positions of trust and authority, including the priesthood, are the sexually predatory and mentally deficient.

    Reply
  3. Carrie says:
    September 26, 2009 at 4:24 pm

    p.s.
    re: Catholic church, call their leaders toxic dump managers and money changers and pimps of fiefdoms….but priest???? what a joke

    who would want to join those ranks, male, female, homosexual, bisexual, transexual, or other? sick, think the pope is looking for more pedophiles

    Reply
  4. Aline says:
    September 26, 2009 at 3:10 pm

    There were just as many girls abused by priests as boys despite the ‘report.’ It is just that females are given no credibility when they report. Girls asked for it you know. Do check out on the internet the info by Dr. Gary Schoener who has studied clergy abuse in depth. He has found that girls and boys were abused by priests and that more females are abused by priests than males. Remember that women are low in the church. It looks good, but it is still the same as it has been for centuries only there are no more witch hunts.

    Reply
  5. CER says:
    September 26, 2009 at 10:30 am

    “Bishops are looked upon highly by Catholics and Catholic priests;”
    The above excerpt is from the article. I think it is true in the same sense that dictators are looked upon highly by citizens and a countries leaders. That is to say their “respect” is a matter of being dictated and being feared. If you dig below the surface many are held with contempt.

    Reply
  6. Carrie says:
    September 26, 2009 at 6:00 am

    I have not read this whole article.

    The headline was enough for me to get the jest

    In my opinion, the priesthood, minister and any position that claims to be a representative for god, is a scam.

    I don’t care if you are gay, straight, male or female…..this seeking a position of power and authority by claiming you represent and serve god is a self serving egotistical and power hungry endeavor.

    If you want to call these positions of priest, pastor, minister…or anything, then call them CEO, Money Manager, Damage Control Representatives, Church Managers.

    But for “goodness” sake, come out of the stone age and admit what these positions which started thousand of years ago are institutions and people obsessed with controlling others and using sheep as tools for their own agenda (not god’s)

    geez, So Sad….

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Click here to cancel reply.

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

*

* Copy this password:

* Type or paste password here:

29,626 Spam Comments Blocked so far by Spam Free Wordpress

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

The New University would like to thank the following:
Cheap Cigarettes | Self Storage Solutions | Forex | Bingo Online | Bingo Online | Online Casino | Online Casinos |
© Copyright New University 2012 • All rights reserved.