<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Republicans Defend Tougher Legislation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newuniversity.org/2006/04/opinion/republicans_defend_tougher_legislation79/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2006/04/opinion/republicans_defend_tougher_legislation79/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 May 2012 07:23:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sam Caldwell</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2006/04/opinion/republicans_defend_tougher_legislation79/comment-page-1/#comment-132</link>
		<dc:creator>Sam Caldwell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 21:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newuword1.thomasjbaker.net/?page_id=4380#comment-132</guid>
		<description>Has anyone stopped to consider the factual basis for these laws or their effects?

(1) According to US Department of Justice statistics, only 5% of sex offenders released in 1994 committed a new sex crime.

(2) Additional research has indicated that most sex crimes are committed by persons known to the victim, NOT BY STRANGERS.

(3) Research also indicates that most sex offenses are committed by FIRST TIME OFFENDERS and not by repeat offenders...a fact reinforced by the 5% recidivism rate.

(4) States already have registries, and not the federal government is imposing its legislation on a state matter, threatening to remove 10% of federal funds from non-compliant states.  This is more about money than public safety.

(5) Do you consider your federal government MORE efficient and responsive to the public interest than the states?

(6) Do you support a national ID card system?  There are more than 650,000 people registered as sex offenders today with an annual growth rate of 7%.

(7) Most are not aware of the increasing number of persons considered to be &quot;sex offenders&quot; or the crimes they have committed, including persons who have simply urinated on the side of the road without knowing a minor was present.

(8) The largest group of registered sex offenders are 14-year-olds who will more than likely never commit a new crime.

This is a bad idea.  But as far as child pornography?  Come on.  One piece of kiddie porn is a felony in Texas...what is wrong with California?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone stopped to consider the factual basis for these laws or their effects?</p>
<p>(1) According to US Department of Justice statistics, only 5% of sex offenders released in 1994 committed a new sex crime.</p>
<p>(2) Additional research has indicated that most sex crimes are committed by persons known to the victim, NOT BY STRANGERS.</p>
<p>(3) Research also indicates that most sex offenses are committed by FIRST TIME OFFENDERS and not by repeat offenders&#8230;a fact reinforced by the 5% recidivism rate.</p>
<p>(4) States already have registries, and not the federal government is imposing its legislation on a state matter, threatening to remove 10% of federal funds from non-compliant states.  This is more about money than public safety.</p>
<p>(5) Do you consider your federal government MORE efficient and responsive to the public interest than the states?</p>
<p>(6) Do you support a national ID card system?  There are more than 650,000 people registered as sex offenders today with an annual growth rate of 7%.</p>
<p>(7) Most are not aware of the increasing number of persons considered to be &#8220;sex offenders&#8221; or the crimes they have committed, including persons who have simply urinated on the side of the road without knowing a minor was present.</p>
<p>(8) The largest group of registered sex offenders are 14-year-olds who will more than likely never commit a new crime.</p>
<p>This is a bad idea.  But as far as child pornography?  Come on.  One piece of kiddie porn is a felony in Texas&#8230;what is wrong with California?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
