
By Scott Roeder | Staff Photographer
In early September, an overwhelming 96 percent of 10,000 UC employees approved a vote of no confidence in President Yudof. The president of the UC-AFT, a union, Bob Samuels, accused him of adding to the “pile of half-truths, untruths and misrepresentation.” He has been called “culpably cavalier” and “shockingly irresponsible.” Many have even called for his resignation, causing the chant, “Lay-off Yudof,” to rise in popularity at protest rallies.
A lot of this criticism has been undeserved. The embattled President of the UC System has only held the office since March of 2008, while the budget cuts and fee increases themselves have been rising steadily over the past twenty years. By the time the Board of Regents approved Yudof’s appointment, the system was already in crisis. In fact, Mark Yudof was specifically recruited in a nationwide search due to his prior successes at the University of Texas and the University of Minnesota, where he fought successfully to increase state funding.
Many of the forces behind the current crisis are completely out of Yudof’s control. The state, facing a projected $7 billion deficit next year, has passed the gap onto the University of California. The UC system must now find a way to close the $535 million shortfall for the 2009-2010 school year. Yudof has to find some way to close these gaps. While many disagree with the specifics of his actions, most people are able to understand the challenges Yudof faces in office.
While there are many things that are clearly beyond Yudof’s control, he does have complete control over one thing — his personal conduct as the leader of the largest and most prestigious public university system in the world.
In last week’s New York Times magazine, a publication with a circulation rate of 1,623,697, Mark Yudof gave an interview that sparked serious concerns amongst students, faculty and others in the UC community regarding his leadership ability.
The interview, entitled “Big Man On Campus,” painted a picture of a man who remains largely disconnected from the concerns and worries of the very people he was hired to represent. He comes off as blithe and borderline callous about the sacrifices that many have had to make.
There was a blatant disregard, and borderline indifference to the employees who have been laid off or furloughed. There was no sensitivity shown to the students who are currently trying to figure out how to pay for the latest fee increase.
He gave off no spark of leadership, no glimmer of hope and absolutely no indication that the people of California could count on him to defend the UC system during a time of crisis.
Instead, President Yudof compared being UC president to managing a cemetery.
He responded to a question about why he was in education by offhandedly calling it “all an accident” and added that he had expected to be a lawyer instead. When asked why the administrators of public universities (including himself) earned more than the President of the United States ($400,000), Yudof said he would consider taking a lower salary if the package included Air Force One and the White House.
All in all, Yudof came off as facetious and flippant.
By the middle of last week, the article had become one the most talked about articles, prompting many shocked, hurt and angry reactions over the Internet and throughout the halls of campus departments across the state.
Surely, many thought, the President of the UC system would know better than to give his detractors such excellent ammunition. Surely, he would have more consideration for the UC community.
At a recent Question & Answer session for student reporters held at UC Irvine over the weekend, one participant asked Yudof about the article. Yudof simply said that he had only been responding to the circumstances. A zany reporter was interviewing him, so he gave zany answers.
Mr. Yudof, we are not laughing.
The University of California does not need a stand-up comedian – we need a leader. We need to know that you, as the “big man on campus,” understand the costs of every cut, every reduction and every fee increase. We need someone with the vision and the passion to pull the UC community through the biggest crisis we have faced since the founding of the system. The issues are serious, and as the head of this system, you need to take them seriously.
Read excerpts from the New York Times Magazine interview, “Big Man on Campus,” at the opinion section’s blog, the OpinionEater at newuniversity.org.
Send comments to newuopinion@newuniversity.org. Please include your name, major and major.
Popularity: unranked [?]












“Fiat Lux?” So Enlighten Me. | Painting an Everchanging Canvas Says:
[...] unpopular these days, but he’s got quite a few Twitter followers (myself included) and even a sympathizer…and a $326,791 [...]
Posted on November 20th, 2009 at 10:59 pm
transparency Says:
Don’t blame Sacramento blame President Yudof and Chancellor of Cal. The hefty price of University of California Berkeley OE Program. The UC Berkley budget gap has grown to $150 million, and still the Chancellor is spending money that isn’t there on $3,000,000 consultants. His reasons range from the need for impartiality to requiring the consultants “thinking, expertise, and new knowledge”.
Does this mean that the faculty and senior management of the UCB world-class research & teaching institution lack the knowledge, integrity, impartiality, innovation, and professionalism to come up with solutions? Have they been fudging their research for years? The consultants will glean their recommendations from faculty interviews & the senior management that hired them; yet $ 150 million of inefficiencies and solutions could be found internally if the Chancellor and his & Provost Breslauer were doing the work of their jobs.
The victims of this folly are Faculty and Students. $ 3 million consultant fees would be far better spent on students & faculty.
There can be only one conclusion as to why creative savings & solutions have not been forthcoming from faculty & staff: Chancellor Birgeneau has lost credibility & the trust of the faculty & the Cal Academic Senate leadership – C. Kutz/F.Doyle. Even if the faculty agrees with the consultants’ recommendations – disagreeing might put their jobs in jeopardy – the underlying problem of lost credibility and trust will remain.
Contact your representatives in Sacramento: tell them of the hefty $ being spent by California Berkeley Chancellor Birgeneau and Provost Breslauer.
Posted on August 12th, 2010 at 7:32 pm