<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taking Coachella</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 03:30:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/comment-page-1/#comment-2311</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=11174#comment-2311</guid>
		<description>one spelling error, great rebuttal! i retract everything i said.  


did you even bother considering the other genres that coachella has to offer when you wrote this article?  you didn&#039;t even mention the edm acts but i guess its not like the sahara tent is the next biggest attraction after the mainstage or anything.  if you didn&#039;t want such a negative response maybe you shouldn&#039;t have called coachella a wide eyed indie kids coming of age ritual since...well..its not.  not wasting any more time commenting on this, its not my reputation that needs salvaging after this anyways. later</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>one spelling error, great rebuttal! i retract everything i said.  </p>
<p>did you even bother considering the other genres that coachella has to offer when you wrote this article?  you didn&#8217;t even mention the edm acts but i guess its not like the sahara tent is the next biggest attraction after the mainstage or anything.  if you didn&#8217;t want such a negative response maybe you shouldn&#8217;t have called coachella a wide eyed indie kids coming of age ritual since&#8230;well..its not.  not wasting any more time commenting on this, its not my reputation that needs salvaging after this anyways. later</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sandy Rose</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/comment-page-1/#comment-2308</link>
		<dc:creator>Sandy Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 19:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=11174#comment-2308</guid>
		<description>you don&#039;t need to engage the trolls my little kittens... especially this one - he can&#039;t even spell. &lt;3, mama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you don&#8217;t need to engage the trolls my little kittens&#8230; especially this one &#8211; he can&#8217;t even spell. &lt;3, mama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/comment-page-1/#comment-2305</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 23:33:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=11174#comment-2305</guid>
		<description>I guess I should have taken a wider survey of concert-goers? Like I said, I base this &quot;degree of indifference&quot; off of the message boards that I&#039;ve seen, and personal conversations that I&#039;ve had with college radio staff, who are usually pretty &quot;with it.&quot;

And it is, after all, a degree of indifference, not an overwhelming wave of indifference; &lt;em&gt;nor&lt;/em&gt; is it necessarily a &lt;em&gt;negative response.&lt;/em&gt;

The reaction to this specific line-up is not a particularized thing, dudes. Apathy is seeping into the &quot;indie scene,&quot; as I see it...and I point out all the positives of this year&#039;s Coachella to remove any caution from the cautious optimism that I&#039;ve seen.

Maybe my focus was a bit off, as it was hard to try to siphon my research on music festivals in general into this piece. I&#039;ll allow that much.

As for this being a &quot;space-filler,&quot; I don&#039;t mean that my heart isn&#039;t into it, nor do I mean that I&#039;m half-assing it. I mean that I write these on incredibly short notice, with very little wiggle room with topics.

Lastly, it is slightly disturbing that this article, which I viewed as, at worst, inoffensive, has been thrown back at me as a means of personal attack. That&#039;s just not write, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess I should have taken a wider survey of concert-goers? Like I said, I base this &#8220;degree of indifference&#8221; off of the message boards that I&#8217;ve seen, and personal conversations that I&#8217;ve had with college radio staff, who are usually pretty &#8220;with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>And it is, after all, a degree of indifference, not an overwhelming wave of indifference; <em>nor</em> is it necessarily a <em>negative response.</em></p>
<p>The reaction to this specific line-up is not a particularized thing, dudes. Apathy is seeping into the &#8220;indie scene,&#8221; as I see it&#8230;and I point out all the positives of this year&#8217;s Coachella to remove any caution from the cautious optimism that I&#8217;ve seen.</p>
<p>Maybe my focus was a bit off, as it was hard to try to siphon my research on music festivals in general into this piece. I&#8217;ll allow that much.</p>
<p>As for this being a &#8220;space-filler,&#8221; I don&#8217;t mean that my heart isn&#8217;t into it, nor do I mean that I&#8217;m half-assing it. I mean that I write these on incredibly short notice, with very little wiggle room with topics.</p>
<p>Lastly, it is slightly disturbing that this article, which I viewed as, at worst, inoffensive, has been thrown back at me as a means of personal attack. That&#8217;s just not write, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/comment-page-1/#comment-2304</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 22:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=11174#comment-2304</guid>
		<description>&quot;I was with the author while this piece was being written, and I can guarantee that hours of research went in to this article. If you disagree with the writer’s opinion about a specific band, don’t use that as a reason to insult the writer’s general abilities, level of professionalism, or intelligence.&quot;

its apparent through the *countless* errors and mischaracterizations (literally the amount of effort required to point out all of them would require hours of work) that all of that extensive research was an attempt to compensate for a blatant lack of insight and background on the subject.  the whole thing comes off as brutally pretentious, a pseudo-sophisticated commentary on music you clearly know nothing about other than what you found on pitchfork.  i love how the newspaper staff comes on to defend this shite article.

i say this as a long time editor/writer for a college newspaper, a regular coachella attendee, avid follower of indie music (among dozens of others musical styles represented at the festival), and a lifelong musician...when the only people on here defending you are your fellow staff members, you may want to take a more critical look at your own work Rebecca.  This would be a lot different if it was some controversial news or opinion piece, but its not.  It&#039;s A&amp;E, when people rail against your work its probably because you missed the mark.  

Perhaps the greatest indicator of your indiscretion is in your baseless remark that this years coachella has had a lackluster response.  You have to be kidding right?  This year is being regarded as the first since they moved to a 3 day lineup where all 3 headliners are worthy of the spot.  Regardless of where you stand on Jay-Z, Muse, and Gorillaz, all 3 of those artists are HUGE in their own regard and there is a TON of buzz about this year on my campus.  Compare that to years past where you get acts like Prince, Bjork, Roger Waters, Paul F*kn McCartney, and the Cure billed against trash headliners like the Killers and Jack Johnson.  Leave the real music talk for the big kids please.  I&#039;m glad the kids of UCI aren&#039;t on board with you on this one.


P.S.  Soundgarden blows, at least you&#039;re write about that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I was with the author while this piece was being written, and I can guarantee that hours of research went in to this article. If you disagree with the writer’s opinion about a specific band, don’t use that as a reason to insult the writer’s general abilities, level of professionalism, or intelligence.&#8221;</p>
<p>its apparent through the *countless* errors and mischaracterizations (literally the amount of effort required to point out all of them would require hours of work) that all of that extensive research was an attempt to compensate for a blatant lack of insight and background on the subject.  the whole thing comes off as brutally pretentious, a pseudo-sophisticated commentary on music you clearly know nothing about other than what you found on pitchfork.  i love how the newspaper staff comes on to defend this shite article.</p>
<p>i say this as a long time editor/writer for a college newspaper, a regular coachella attendee, avid follower of indie music (among dozens of others musical styles represented at the festival), and a lifelong musician&#8230;when the only people on here defending you are your fellow staff members, you may want to take a more critical look at your own work Rebecca.  This would be a lot different if it was some controversial news or opinion piece, but its not.  It&#8217;s A&amp;E, when people rail against your work its probably because you missed the mark.  </p>
<p>Perhaps the greatest indicator of your indiscretion is in your baseless remark that this years coachella has had a lackluster response.  You have to be kidding right?  This year is being regarded as the first since they moved to a 3 day lineup where all 3 headliners are worthy of the spot.  Regardless of where you stand on Jay-Z, Muse, and Gorillaz, all 3 of those artists are HUGE in their own regard and there is a TON of buzz about this year on my campus.  Compare that to years past where you get acts like Prince, Bjork, Roger Waters, Paul F*kn McCartney, and the Cure billed against trash headliners like the Killers and Jack Johnson.  Leave the real music talk for the big kids please.  I&#8217;m glad the kids of UCI aren&#8217;t on board with you on this one.</p>
<p>P.S.  Soundgarden blows, at least you&#8217;re write about that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lumb</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/comment-page-1/#comment-2303</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lumb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 09:49:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=11174#comment-2303</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d just like to point out that the first four belligerent responses were made within 12 hours of this going online - I imagine an alert sounding in the wee hours of the morning indicating a slight to early &#039;90s music on the computers of those internet vigilantes who defend their bands to their dying breath. Then the miffed commenters lash out with personal criticisms that have nothing to do with the article as a whole, nit-picking details they take issue with to justify their internet RAGE. 

Seriously, guys, you take issue with the author&#039;s opinion and yet withhold discussion in favor of cutting down the author to make yourselves feel superior? &quot;Terribly written and poorly researched&quot; are worthless criticisms if you aren&#039;t specific and offer constructive criticism instead of lazy ad hominem pot shots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d just like to point out that the first four belligerent responses were made within 12 hours of this going online &#8211; I imagine an alert sounding in the wee hours of the morning indicating a slight to early &#8217;90s music on the computers of those internet vigilantes who defend their bands to their dying breath. Then the miffed commenters lash out with personal criticisms that have nothing to do with the article as a whole, nit-picking details they take issue with to justify their internet RAGE. </p>
<p>Seriously, guys, you take issue with the author&#8217;s opinion and yet withhold discussion in favor of cutting down the author to make yourselves feel superior? &#8220;Terribly written and poorly researched&#8221; are worthless criticisms if you aren&#8217;t specific and offer constructive criticism instead of lazy ad hominem pot shots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natasha Aftandilians</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/comment-page-1/#comment-2302</link>
		<dc:creator>Natasha Aftandilians</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 08:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=11174#comment-2302</guid>
		<description>I was with the author while this piece was being written, and I can guarantee that hours of research went in to this article.  If you disagree with the writer&#039;s opinion about a specific band, don&#039;t use that as a reason to insult the writer&#039;s general abilities, level of professionalism, or intelligence.  

I suggest that all of you who have so much to say actually sign up to write for the New U, and do something productive with all the time you spend on these comments.  I doubt any of you could write an article that comes close to anything Rebecca has ever slapped together, but prove me wrong.  Our section is always looking for new talent...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was with the author while this piece was being written, and I can guarantee that hours of research went in to this article.  If you disagree with the writer&#8217;s opinion about a specific band, don&#8217;t use that as a reason to insult the writer&#8217;s general abilities, level of professionalism, or intelligence.  </p>
<p>I suggest that all of you who have so much to say actually sign up to write for the New U, and do something productive with all the time you spend on these comments.  I doubt any of you could write an article that comes close to anything Rebecca has ever slapped together, but prove me wrong.  Our section is always looking for new talent&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: finalarbiteroftasteandjustice</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/comment-page-1/#comment-2301</link>
		<dc:creator>finalarbiteroftasteandjustice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 07:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=11174#comment-2301</guid>
		<description>Mark my words, I will be telling my children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren of the great injustice done to Soundgarden in this piece of &quot;college&quot; journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark my words, I will be telling my children, grandchildren, and great-grandchildren of the great injustice done to Soundgarden in this piece of &#8220;college&#8221; journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dkd</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/comment-page-1/#comment-2295</link>
		<dc:creator>dkd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 01:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=11174#comment-2295</guid>
		<description>&gt;I apologize, gentlemen. Next week we will run an apology.

Are you being serious here, or is this just another example of your inability to acknowledge a mistake without injecting pointless sarcasm? For the record, I could care less about Soundgarden - I was just amazed by the immaturity of your response to Chris&#039;s post. Most writers who take their work seriously would have thanked him for the correction and moved on.

None of the bands you mentioned are headliners except Muse. And while I actually agree with you that Muse are rather lame, they are not indie rock (neither are Them Crooked Vultures for that matter).

As for the alleged indifference, for what it&#039;s worth, the general reaction over at the Coachella message board has been pretty positive. No, that doesn&#039;t prove anything, but neither do the links you posted. They&#039;re just random comments made by random people. You&#039;re perfectly entitled to pass your own verdict on how good the lineup is, but why don&#039;t we wait until the ticket sales figures are in before we make any definitive statements about its popularity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;I apologize, gentlemen. Next week we will run an apology.</p>
<p>Are you being serious here, or is this just another example of your inability to acknowledge a mistake without injecting pointless sarcasm? For the record, I could care less about Soundgarden &#8211; I was just amazed by the immaturity of your response to Chris&#8217;s post. Most writers who take their work seriously would have thanked him for the correction and moved on.</p>
<p>None of the bands you mentioned are headliners except Muse. And while I actually agree with you that Muse are rather lame, they are not indie rock (neither are Them Crooked Vultures for that matter).</p>
<p>As for the alleged indifference, for what it&#8217;s worth, the general reaction over at the Coachella message board has been pretty positive. No, that doesn&#8217;t prove anything, but neither do the links you posted. They&#8217;re just random comments made by random people. You&#8217;re perfectly entitled to pass your own verdict on how good the lineup is, but why don&#8217;t we wait until the ticket sales figures are in before we make any definitive statements about its popularity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shapan</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/comment-page-1/#comment-2294</link>
		<dc:creator>Shapan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:29:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=11174#comment-2294</guid>
		<description>please run the apology

entitle it &quot;DEAR SOUNDGARDEN FANS&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>please run the apology</p>
<p>entitle it &#8220;DEAR SOUNDGARDEN FANS&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesbliss</title>
		<link>http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/01/entertainment/taking-coachella/comment-page-1/#comment-2290</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesbliss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 21:07:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=11174#comment-2290</guid>
		<description>Without Soundgarden, virgins everywhere would have to wait for someone to crack a joke about Blind Melon! Because they care about FACTS and PROFESSIONALISM and PROPER REPORTING!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Without Soundgarden, virgins everywhere would have to wait for someone to crack a joke about Blind Melon! Because they care about FACTS and PROFESSIONALISM and PROPER REPORTING!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
