Comments on: Letter To The Editor http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/09/opinion/letter-to-the-editor-6/ Thu, 24 May 2012 03:30:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: student http://www.newuniversity.org/2010/09/opinion/letter-to-the-editor-6/comment-page-1/#comment-3623 student Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:29:11 +0000 http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=14718#comment-3623 how silly. it's not prohibition because THC lasts longer in the system? that's it? care to elaborate a little bit? it does not matter what the drug is. prohibition is just a method and the question is whether the method is effective - and it is *quite dubious* that prohibition or any other kind of supply-side ban is effective. Charles Stimson is an asshole lawyer who worked with the government. He probably has thousands of conflicts of interests in writing any article. Who gives a fuck what he says? i dont care if the proposition is past or not, why does "C.W. Lambert" choose to such vacuous arguments? how silly. it’s not prohibition because THC lasts longer in the system? that’s it? care to elaborate a little bit? it does not matter what the drug is. prohibition is just a method and the question is whether the method is effective – and it is *quite dubious* that prohibition or any other kind of supply-side ban is effective.

Charles Stimson is an asshole lawyer who worked with the government. He probably has thousands of conflicts of interests in writing any article. Who gives a fuck what he says?

i dont care if the proposition is past or not, why does “C.W. Lambert” choose to such vacuous arguments?

]]>