Comments on: The Threat of Radiation http://www.newuniversity.org/2011/11/news/the-threat-of-radiation/ Thu, 24 May 2012 03:30:49 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 By: Dever http://www.newuniversity.org/2011/11/news/the-threat-of-radiation/comment-page-1/#comment-19794 Dever Tue, 20 Dec 2011 05:09:10 +0000 http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=24578#comment-19794 Japan can recover this issue because there is well technology based. If same thing happen to a third country then what will happen? Thanks for great article Japan can recover this issue because there is well technology based. If same thing happen to a third country then what will happen?
Thanks for great article

]]> By: gr81 http://www.newuniversity.org/2011/11/news/the-threat-of-radiation/comment-page-1/#comment-16421 gr81 Wed, 30 Nov 2011 04:21:21 +0000 http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=24578#comment-16421 I believe this article is yet another deception produced by funding from the nuclear power companies. I believe this article is yet another deception produced by funding from the nuclear power companies.

]]> By: El Doctor http://www.newuniversity.org/2011/11/news/the-threat-of-radiation/comment-page-1/#comment-16398 El Doctor Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:40:53 +0000 http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=24578#comment-16398 Noted! I actually plan to update the article next quarter since it was rushed and include interviews with experts from UCI. I will make note to add a reference to the levels. Thanks very much for your critique. Noted! I actually plan to update the article next quarter since it was rushed and include interviews with experts from UCI. I will make note to add a reference to the levels.

Thanks very much for your critique.

]]> By: Michael http://www.newuniversity.org/2011/11/news/the-threat-of-radiation/comment-page-1/#comment-16388 Michael Tue, 29 Nov 2011 20:59:26 +0000 http://www.newuniversity.org/?p=24578#comment-16388 The article sites various numbers that people have no frame of reference to know whether they are high or low or what impact they have. How many of us know what the background level of radiation in soil is? How many of us know how many times greater than background does it have to be to cause harm and how long or how much soil or produce does one have to eat for this to cause harm? Without providing a frame of reference for the numbers the article might as well have left them out, which would have made it more concise and easier to read. The article sites various numbers that people have no frame of reference to know whether they are high or low or what impact they have. How many of us know what the background level of radiation in soil is? How many of us know how many times greater than background does it have to be to cause harm and how long or how much soil or produce does one have to eat for this to cause harm?

Without providing a frame of reference for the numbers the article might as well have left them out, which would have made it more concise and easier to read.

]]>